It all boils down to the culture's core values of nationalism, filial respect, and utopia.īut while parades and displays of appreciation for their leader were being put on, Kim Jong Il was starving his nation and having people killed left and right. His arrival to any given place was treated as nothing less than a total celebration. For example, Kim Jong Il's reign was marked by a lot of pomp and circumstance. So how do we resolve this conundrum? What makes figures like Kim Jong Il so unnerving is that they're highly unpredictable and cruel while at the same time being beloved by their countrymen. The recent figures of the Kim dynasty in North Korea are known as total laughingstocks worldwide, but they're also simultaneously known to be incredibly dangerous. He certainly looked like a man that could not be taken down. Though his reign was seen as terrible by his own people as it was happening, Stalin's vice grip on his country held for many years as he put himself in such high esteem through propaganda tactics. He even stuck his name in the national anthem. He built a cult of personality, renaming cities after himself and revising textbooks to put himself in their center. While he made his ability to use terror and violence known, he did understand the value of propaganda. He was forthright about his brutality and immediately used violent means to secure his ends. Unlike Lenin, he was not initially sympathetic or coy about his intentions. Like Lenin, he killed anyone who stood in his path, including civilian farmers who had their land taken away and made property of the state. Stalin ended up accomplishing the task of industrialization but in the most brutal way possible. He wanted to transform what was largely a peasant state into one of grand industrialism. Stalin rose to power after Lenin and sought to secure his own vision of Russia. It was his ability to transfer his feelings into compelling speech that began to win him notoriety. "As he began, it was all he had." Before taking his place as Chancellor of Germany and Führer, Hitler was just one of many who felt deeply wounded by the diminished motherland after the signing of the Treaty of Versailles. "The Führer is the first person in Germany to use speech to make history," he writes. Hitler's Minister for Public Enlightenment and Propaganda, Joseph Goebbels, recognized the importance and intensity of Hitler's rhetoric in his analysis "The Führer as a Speaker." In this essay, Goebbels explains exactly what it was that made Hitler the best orator Germany had ever seen and how that propelled his cause to incredible ends. Hitler was an impassioned, charismatic, and eloquent speaker who knew how to strike at the hearts of his people. While his scheming, his military actions, and his undeterred ego all helped him rise to power, his influence truly came from his oratory skills. Hitler knew how to win over the German people at a time when they felt weakest, after the devastating results of World War I.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |